When we look at
the re-telling of Anne’s story throughout history, we are struck by two very
different versions of this woman. Much of what we know has been shaped, not by
her own writings, but by those who knew her. The Spanish ambassador, Eustace
Chapuys, wrote extensively about the court of Henry VIII. As Katherine of
Aragon was the aunt of King Charles of Spain, Chapuys was heavily biased
against Anne. Much of the rumor and innuendo we have about Anne comes from his
letters back to the Spain as he was prone to gossip. Despite his sympathy for
the Lady Mary and her mother Katherine and his intense disapproval of Anne (he
wouldn’t even write her name in letters, simply referring to her as the “concubine”
or “putain”), he nevertheless reported that Anne was likely innocent of the
crimes for which she had been executed. That being said, he did believe that
Katherine of Aragon’s death was due to poison and laid much of the blame on
the Boleyns, particularly Anne.
Then there was
the issue of Catholicism in England. Prior to his marriage to Anne, Henry had
been a staunch Catholic, even writing a pamphlet denouncing Luther and the
Protestant heresy. For this, Henry had been given the title of Defender of the
Faith by Pope Leo X. Because his desire for an annulment so he could marry Anne
Boleyn was denied, Henry broke England away from the Catholic Church.
This schism caused a great divide in England. Rather than placing the blame on
Henry, Catholics blamed Anne for this rift. She was soon characterized as
a witch who had cast a spell on the King. Nicholas Sander, a staunch Catholic
who sought to depose Elizabeth I and re-establish Catholicism in England, was the
first record that Anne had six fingers on her right hand in 1585. Of course,
this was not true. When her body was exhumed in 1876 and examined, she was
found to have no physical deformities.
In direct
conflict with the Catholic view on Anne, there is the Protestant view. To
reformers, she was seen as a saint. Her primary biographer was John Foxe, who
published his account of her story his Book
of Martyrs. It was his belief that Anne’s downfall had been brought about
by a Catholic conspiracy against her. He wrote that her execution had come
about because:
some secret practising of the papists here not to be lacking, considering what a mighty stop she was to their purposes and proceedings, and on the contrary side, what a strong bulwark she was for the maintenance of Christ’s gospel, and sincere religion, which they then in no case could abide.
He praised her
patronage of reformers like Thomas Cranmer and Hugh Latimer. In his perspective,
Anne was a devout woman who had great respect for the “new religion” and
believed that all should have access to the Word of God. He also believed that
Elizabeth’s ascension to the throne was proof of her innocence and virtue.
During the 18th
and 19th centuries, portrayals of Anne tended toward the romantic
victim. To this group of historians, Anne was simply a strong-willed and beautiful
woman who fell victim to her tyrannical brutish husband. This idea would
persist into the latter half of the 20th century when she became
less the victim of Henry and more the victim of her own ambition and
intelligence. Her political and religious sympathies as well as her patronage
network and influence over foreign policy put her at odds with Thomas Cromwell
and others at Court. American historian, Retha Wernicke, took a less
sympathetic approach, acknowledging firs the gender prejudices of the early 16th
century which would have made Anne a pawn in her family’s quest for power
before she became a willing participant in the power grab. There are some ideas
in her work that most historians find unlikely such as the idea that George was
a homosexual and part of a clandestine group of homosexuals at Court that
included some of the men with whom Anne was accused of adultery as well as the
idea that Anne might have been so desperate to produce a male heir that she
could have been capable of sleeping with her brother to do so.
So what is the
true version of Anne Boleyn? Protestant martyr? Scheming social climber? Whore?
We may never know, but her story continues to fascinate.
For further
reading:
The Rise and Fall of Anne Boleyn: Family
Politics at the Court of Henry VIII
by Retha M. Wernicke
The Creation of Anne Boleyn: A New Look at
England’s Most Notorious Queen
by Susan Bordo
No comments:
Post a Comment